| Date |
Speaker |
Title |
Type |
Useful Links |
| 25 Jun, 2025 - 09:00-09:50 |
HOLMES |
Pauli and Majorana Propagation methods for classically simulating quantum circuits |
Seminar |
Simulating quantum circuits classically is in general a hard task. However,
certain families of quantum circuits may be practically or even provably efficiently
simulable by use of specialized classical algorithms. In this talk, we will cover
”Pauli propagation” which has recently been shown to enable efficient classical
simulation of expectation values in quantum circuits and a wide range of noise-free
quantum circuits. Appreciating the strengths and weaknesses of this simulation
method, and how it can be efficiently combined with other classical and quantum
subroutines, will help point towards promising applications of quantum devices.
We will end by discussing a generalization of this approach to Fermionic systems
opening up new applications in quantum chemistry and material science. This talk
will give an overview of the following works: arxiv:2308.09109, arXiv:2408.12739,
arXiv:2409.01706, arXiv:2411.19896, arXiv:2501.13101, arXiv:2503.18939.
|
| 25 Jun, 2025 - 09:50-10:40 |
ANGRISANI |
On the interplay between noise, scrambling and classical simulation of quantum systems |
Seminar |
Simulating arbitrary quantum dynamics with classical algorithms is widely believed
to be intractable. Yet, by exploiting the structure of certain restricted settings,
specialized classical methods can succeed. One particularly promising family-
Pauli propagation - recasts simulation in the Pauli basis and often delivers rigorous
runtime and error guarantees. At the heart of these guarantees lie two ingredients:
the presence of local noise, which dampens long-range interactions, and a degree of
“scrambling” in the circuit’s gates. In this talk, we will present our recent results
on applying Pauli propagation to both noisy and noiseless circuits. Along the way,
we’ll discuss to what extent noise and scrambling influence simulability - and what
that tells us about the necessary resources for quantum advantage.
|
| 25 Jun, 2025 - 11:10-12:00 |
JERBI |
Shadows of quantum machine learning and shallow-depth learning separations |
Seminar |
In this talk, I will present two recent works related to the question of quantum
advantages in machine learning. In the first work, we address a major obstacle
to the widespread use of quantum machine learning models in practice: quantum
models, even once trained, still require access to a quantum computer in order to be
evaluated on new data. To solve this issue, we introduce a class of quantum models
where quantum resources are only required during training, while the deployment
of the trained model is classical. We prove that: (i) this class of models is universal
for classically-deployed quantum machine learning; (ii) it does have restricted
learning capacities compared to ‘fully quantum’ models, but nonetheless (iii) it
achieves a provable learning advantage over fully classical learners, contingent on
widely believed assumptions in complexity theory. In the second work, we expand
our understanding of where quantum advantages can be found in quantum machine
learning, by showing a PAC learning advantage in the realm of shallow-depth
circuits. This learning advantage has the particularity that it is unconditional,
meaning that we do not need to make assumptions such as the existence of classically
hard, quantumly easy, cryptographic functions to show an advantage. The
machine learning task we consider is that of learning probability distributions, or
generative learning. We design this learning task building on recent results by Bene
Watts and Parham on quantum advantages for sampling, which we technically uplift
to a hyperplane learning problem, identifying non-local correlations as the origin
of the quantum advantage.
|
| 25 Jun, 2025 - 12:00-12:50 |
ANSCHUETZ |
A Unified Theory of Quantum Neural Network Loss Landscapes |
Seminar |
Classical neural networks with random initialization famously behave as Gaussian
processes in the limit of many neurons, which allows one to completely characterize
their training and generalization behavior. While there are settings where
quantum neural networks (QNNs) have also been shown to behave as Gaussian
processes, there exist known counterexamples to this behavior. We here prove that
QNNs and their first two derivatives instead generally form what we call ”Wishart
processes,” where certain algebraic properties of the network determine the hyperparameters
of the process. This Wishart process description allows us to, for the
first time: give necessary and sufficient conditions for a QNN architecture to have a
Gaussian process limit; calculate the full gradient distribution, generalizing previously
known barren plateau results; and calculate the local minima distribution of
algebraically constrained QNNs. Our unified framework suggests a certain simple
operational definition for the ”trainability” of a given QNN model using a newly
introduced, experimentally accessible quantity we call the ”degrees of freedom” of
the network architecture.
|
| 25 Jun, 2025 - 14:50-15:40 |
MELE |
Effect of noise in typical quantum circuits |
Seminar |
Motivated by realistic hardware considerations of the pre-fault-tolerant era, we
comprehensively study the impact of uncorrected noise on typical quantum circuits.
We first show that any noise ‘truncates’ most quantum circuits to effectively
logarithmic depth, in the task of estimating observable expectation values. We
then prove that quantum circuits under any non-unital noise exhibit lack of barren
plateaus for cost functions composed of local observables. But, we also design
an efficient classical algorithm to estimate observable expectation values of typical
quantum circuits within any target constant accuracy, in any circuit architecture.
Taken together, our results showcase that, unless we carefully engineer the circuits
to take advantage of the noise, it is unlikely that noisy quantum circuits provide
any quantum advantage for algorithms that output observable expectation value
estimates, like many variational quantum machine learning proposals
|
| 25 Jun, 2025 - 15:40-16:30 |
STILCK FRANÇA |
Information-theoretic Generalization Bounds for Learning from Quantum Data |
Seminar |
Learning tasks are playing an increasingly central role in quantum information
and computation—from fundamental problems like state discrimination and
metrology to quantum PAC learning and the recently proposed “shadow” variants
of state tomography. Yet these various strands of quantum learning theory
have largely evolved in isolation. In this talk, we introduce a unified mathematical
framework for quantum learning based on classical–quantum training data and
show how to bound a quantum learner’s expected generalization error on new data.
Our bounds are expressed in terms of classical and quantum information theoretic
quantities that capture how strongly the learner’s hypothesis depends on the specific
training data. To derive them, we develop non commutative analogues of the
decoupling lemmas underlying recent classical information theoretic generalization
bounds, drawing on tools from quantum optimal transport and quantum concentration
inequalities. This framework subsumes and yields intuitive generalization
bounds for a variety of quantum learning scenarios—including quantum state discrimination,
PAC learning of quantum states or classical functions, and quantum
parameter estimation—laying the groundwork for a unified, information theoretic
perspective on quantum learning.
|
| 26 Jun, 2025 - 09:00-09:50 |
CARO |
Interactive proofs for verifying (quantum) learning and testing |
Seminar |
We consider the problem of testing and learning from data in the presence of
resource constraints, such as limited memory or weak data access, which place limitations
on the efficiency and feasibility of testing or learning. In particular, we
ask the following question: Could a resource-constrained learner/tester use interaction
with a resource-unconstrained but untrusted party to solve a learning or
testing problem more efficiently than they could without such an interaction? In
this work, we answer this question both abstractly and for concrete problems, in
two complementary ways: For a wide variety of scenarios, we prove that a resourceconstrained
learner cannot gain any advantage through classical interaction with
an untrusted prover. As a special case, we show that for the vast majority of testing
and learning problems in which quantum memory is a meaningful resource, a
memory-constrained quantum algorithm cannot overcome its limitations via classical
communication with a memory-unconstrained quantum prover. In contrast,
when quantum communication is allowed, we construct a variety of interactive
proof protocols, for specific learning and testing problems, which allow memoryconstrained
quantum verifiers to gain significant advantages through delegation to
untrusted provers. These results highlight both the limitations and potential of delegating
learning and testing problems to resource-rich but untrusted third parties.
|
| 26 Jun, 2025 - 09:50-10:40 |
GIRARDI |
Trained quantum neural networks and Gaussian processes |
Seminar |
We study quantum neural networks made by parametric one-qubit gates and
fixed two-qubit gates in the limit of infinite width, where the generated function
is the expectation value of the sum of single-qubit observables over all the qubits.
First, we prove that the probability distribution of the function generated by the
untrained network with randomly initialized parameters converges to a Gaussian
process whenever each measured qubit is correlated only with few other measured
qubits. Then, we analytically characterize the training of the network via gradient
descent with square loss on supervised learning problems. In particular, as long as
the network is not affected by barren plateaus, the trained network can perfectly fit
the training set and that the probability distribution of the function generated after
training still converges in distribution to a Gaussian process, also in the presence of
the statistical noise of the measurement at the output of the network. For finite size
circuits, we make the convergence quantitative in terms of the Wasserstein distance
of order 1.
|
| 26 Jun, 2025 - 11:10-12:00 |
OTTAVIANI |
EuroQHPC-I and QEC4QEA: role of Italy into the european HPC-QC ecosystem |
Seminar |
Italy is at the forefront of shaping the European HPC-QC ecosystem, playing a
key role in two major initiatives: EuroQHPC-I and QEC4QEA. As one of the selected
hosting entities for a European quantum computer, Italy is set to pioneer the
integration of quantum computing with high-performance computing (HPC). This
integration, conducted alongside other selected hosting entities, will mark a significant
step toward the hybrid computing architectures of the future. Simultaneously,
Italy has been chosen to lead Europe’s first Center of Excellence in Quantum Computing,
QEC4QEA. This initiative will drive the development of the first HPC-QC
applications, accelerating the adoption of quantum technologies in scientific and
industrial domains. By spearheading both infrastructure deployment and software
innovation, Italy is in pole position to build the future European HPC-QC ecosystem,
reinforcing its leadership in quantum and high-performance computing.
|
| 26 Jun, 2025 - 12:00-12:50 |
MACALUSO |
Limitations and Methodological Pathways in Quantum Unsupervised and Reinforcement Learning |
Seminar |
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has recently been explored as a novel approach
to surpass the capabilities of classical methods, although the field remains
in its early stages and the outcomes achieved so far are still inconclusive. This
talk offers a critical and methodologically grounded perspective on current QML
approaches, with particular attention to the fundamental limitations of classical
machine learning and the ways in which quantum-enhanced models may be designed
to address these challenges. Recent developments in unsupervised and reinforcement
learning serve as illustrative examples to examine how quantum formulations,
tailored to the structure of specific problems, can yield algorithmic and
representational advantages. Methodological aspects such as model design, problem
encoding, and hybrid integration are emphasized, along with a discussion of
current limitations in quantum computing, including hardware constraints and the
lack of mature, task-specific quantum design principles. The talk concludes with
reflections on how these insights may inform the development of more robust and
effective QML methodologies.
|
| 26 Jun, 2025 - 14:50-15:40 |
Mari |
Can AI learn the best way to use a noisy quantum computer? MARI Abstract |
Seminar |
We explore the broad question posed in the title from different perspectives. We
show how a classical neural network can be trained to optimally embed features
into a quantum system and to optimally extract information from it. We review
the concept of variational quantum error mitigation, i.e., the idea of variationally
optimizing error mitigation strategies. We present recent results demonstrating
how classical deep learning models and noisy quantum computers can cooperate to
better estimate quantum expectation values. Finally, as a speculative open problem,
we propose pushing the core question to its extreme limit: Can AI autonomously
decide how to optimally use a noisy quantum computer without hard-coding any
specific error-reduction strategy?
|
| 26 Jun, 2025 - 15:40-16:30 |
MORGILLO |
Quantum optical classifier with superexponential speedup |
Seminar |
Cat or dog? Can a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer tell the difference? This
talk presents a quantum optical method for binary classification that recognizes
patterns without the need for image reconstruction. By encoding both data and
model parameters into single-photon states and leveraging two-photon interference,
the system classifies patterns directly through coincidence rates. Acting as a quantum
analogue of a classical neuron, it operates—once trained—with constant O(1)
resource complexity, achieving a superexponential speedup over its classical counterpart
|
| 27 Jun, 2025 - 09:00-09:50 |
PASTORELLO |
Quantum GANs and optimal mass transport |
Seminar |
After an introduction to the notion of quantum generative adversarial networks
(qGANs), I will summarize a recent quantum tomography protocol for constructing
a classical estimate of a quantum state by performing repeated measurements on a
n-qubit system. I will then discuss the convergence of the protocol with respect to a
quantum version of the first-orderWasserstein distance, a fundamental notion of the
theory of optimal mass transport. In particular, I will show how this convergence
result allows us to conclude that a qGAN can be equivalently trained using classical
estimators of quantum states instead of quantum data. This fact is important in
practice, as it enables the training of quantum models without requiring direct
access to quantum memory or coherent quantum data streams.
|
| 27 Jun, 2025 - 09:50-10:40 |
SUTTER |
Uhlmann’s theorem for relative entropies |
Seminar |
Uhlmann’s theorem states that, for any two quantum states ρAB and σA, there
exists an extension σAB of σA such that the fidelity between ρAB and σAB equals
the fidelity between their reduced states ρA and σA. In this work, we generalize
Uhlmann’s theorem to α-R´enyi relative entropies for α ∈ [12,∞], a family of
divergences that encompasses fidelity, relative entropy, and max-relative entropy
corresponding to α = 12, α = 1, and α = ∞, respectively.
Joint work with Giulia Mazzola and Renato Renner
|
| 27 Jun, 2025 - 11:10-12:00 |
Mazzucchi |
A swap test photonic integrated circuit for determining quantum entanglement |
Seminar |
Entanglement is a fundamental resource in quantum computation and quantum
communication, but it is potentially affected by decoherence phenomena that make
it necessary to introduce appropriate tests to certify and quantify the degree of
entanglement of a quantum state. In this talk. I will show how a photonic integrated
circuit designed to implement the swap test algorithm can be adapted to an efficient
entanglement witness for both pure and mixed bipartite states.
|
| 27 Jun, 2025 - 12:00-12:50 |
Pereira |
Out-of-distribution generalisation for learning quantum channels with low-energy coherent states |
Seminar |
Investigating the input-output relations of a quantum process can be seen as
a learning problem. For instance, we could wish to find the optimal parameters
for some quantum device that let it best mimic our target process, or we could
simply wish to construct the best possible mathematical model of the process. Experimentally,
we send probes through the quantum channel and use the outputs
as our training set. When learning the action of a continuous variable (CV) quantum
process in this way, there will often be some restriction on the input states
used. One experimentally simple way to probe CV channels is using low-energy
coherent states. Learning a quantum channel in this way presents difficulties, since
two channels may act similarly on low energy inputs but very differently for high
energy inputs. They may also act similarly on coherent state inputs but differently
on non-classical inputs. Extrapolating the behaviour of a channel for more general
input states from its action on the far more limited set of low energy coherent states
is a case of out-of-distribution generalisation. To be sure that such generalisation
gives meaningful results, one needs to relate error bounds for the training set to
bounds that are valid for all inputs. We show that for any pair of channels that
act sufficiently similarly on low energy coherent state inputs, one can bound how
different the input-output relations are for any (high energy or highly non-classical)
input. This proves out-of-distribution generalisation is always possible for learning
quantum channels using low energy coherent states.
|